This site is being upgraded. Some pages may change while the work is underway.

Sample audit

A fictional brand, graded end to end.

This is how a Master Brand Audit reads: the Dimension 12 gates first, then every graded dimension, then the written fixes. Lumara Wellness is not a real business, and every grade and finding here is illustrative.

SAMPLE / FICTIONAL

Not a client result. This sample was written to show how the published rubric reads; it was not generated from a real submission. Your own audit grades your real brand from what you submit, and the Branding Team reviews it before delivery.

SAMPLE / FICTIONALSpecimen scorecard

Fictional brand

Lumara Wellness

Health, Wellness & Med Spa

A capable practice under-represented by its own materials: one real differentiator, weak distribution, and nothing in the submission an answer engine could cite.

Graded from a fictional intake against the published rubric. Nothing was loaded, scanned, or searched.

COverall
Grade issued

Dimension 12 · Hard gates · Run first

Clear with conditions

  • Trademark and name collisionSearch requiredA preliminary screen cannot clear a name on its own. Run a formal USPTO clearance search before trademarking or franchising.
  • ADA / WCAG 2.1 AA accessibilityClear with conditionsNo accessibility results were submitted. Check the booking path against WCAG 2.1 AA, with an automated scan and a keyboard pass, before launch.

Preliminary screen, not legal advice.

  1. 01

    Brand Identity & Positioning

    The positioning statement submitted lists services. It never states one promise a client could repeat.

    C
  2. 02

    Website

    The homepage headline submitted leads with services, not the result a client wants, and names no single primary action.

    C
  3. 03

    LinkedIn

    The founder headline submitted is a job title. It does not state the change the practice delivers.

    D
  4. 04

    Social Media

    Two platforms are listed in the submission, with no content pillars or stated purpose for either.

    C
  5. 05

    Content Strategy & Messaging

    The messaging described is feature-led (“we offer X”) with no line from the client's problem to the result.

    D
  6. 06

    Lead Generation & Conversion Infrastructure

    The stated goal is booked consultations, but the submission names no lead magnet and no follow-up sequence.

    D
  7. 07

    Trust & Authority Signals

    The submission mentions reviews but no named client outcomes, case studies, or third-party coverage.

    C
  8. 08

    Competitive Differentiation

    The physician-designed recovery protocol described is a real differentiator. It is not yet the lead claim.

    B
  9. 09

    Online Reputation & Search Presence

    The submission reports a claimed Google Business Profile. The description provided for it does not state the promise.

    B
  10. 10

    Email & Content Distribution

    No email list, welcome sequence, or newsletter is described. A captured lead has nowhere to go.

    F
  11. 11

    AI Search Visibility

    Nothing in the submission gives an answer engine something to cite: no clear category claim, no FAQ written the way buyers ask, no FAQ schema, and no citable specifics. Graded against the AI Search Visibility rubric.

    F
  12. 12

    Legal & Regulatory Exposure

    Gate result above: Clear with conditions. Four scored items:

    • BState consumer protectionOne state of operation and two marketed states were submitted, with standard service claims.
    • CFederal marketing and outreach complianceThe practice sends marketing texts. The submission does not describe how consent for them is captured.
    • BData privacyPersonal data is collected from California residents. Confirm the privacy notice covers them.
    • BCopyright and originalityAssets are stated as licensed, with no documentation trail submitted, which holds this below an A.

    Dimension 12 is a preliminary screen, not legal advice. Findings are a starting point for your attorney, not a clearance opinion. Tappmedia NYC is not a law firm.

    Gate

Sign-off: a real report is issued only after the Branding Team reviews and approves it. This fictional sample has no client and no review.

Sample fixes

A sample of the written fixes.

Every graded dimension comes with its written fix. Tappmedia writes it, the Branding Team reviews it, and you publish it.

Brand Identity & Positioning

One category claim, used everywhere

Replace the service list with one promise the practice can own, for example: “The [City] med spa built around a physician-designed recovery protocol.” Use the same words in the homepage hero, the LinkedIn headline, the Google Business Profile description, and the meta description. One consistent description is easier for a client to repeat and for an answer engine to cite.

Website

A hero that leads with the result

Rewrite the headline from “Full-service med spa offering facials, injectables, and laser” to the result the client wants: “Look refreshed, not worked on.” Add one proof point you can substantiate, such as “[number] treatments performed,” and one primary action: “Book a 15-minute consultation.”

LinkedIn

Founder headline and About rewrite

Headline: “Helping [City] professionals look as rested as they feel. Founder, Lumara Wellness.” Open the About section with the client's problem, then the result, then a clear invitation to book. Do not open with “I.”

AI Search Visibility

Give answer engines something to cite

Add an FAQ written the way buyers ask (“What is the best med spa in [City] for natural results?”) and answer each question with specifics that can be checked. Add FAQ schema that matches the visible text word for word, and keep the category language identical on the Google Business Profile. These are the signals the AI Search Visibility rubric grades.

See this for your own brand.

The Master Brand Audit grades all 12 dimensions of your real brand from your submission and writes the fix for every one. The Branding Team reviews the report before it ships. Pricing is scoped to your brand and set in your proposal.